Mark
12:13-17
Which
Kingdom?
How many UK fans
do we have here today?
How many U of L
fans? The U of L fans are much
more excited this morning! If you
are a UK fan just forget about football season and think about basketball
season.
How many West
Virginia fans do we have? A few,
actually. Thank you to those few
who root for my Mountaineers.
How many fans of
the Buffaloes are here this morning?
Almost everyone is wondering, who? It’s my alma mater – the Milligan
Buffaloes. Milligan such a small
school they don’t have a football team. I'm pleased that Lora could actually find a picture of them for our slides this morning.
What if I said we don’t have much choice in the
teams we root for? Would you
believe me? If you grew up in
Alabama you would probably be an Auburn or Alabama fan. Chris is an Auburn fan – can you
believe it? He even has an Auburn
tag on the front of his car! If
you grew up in California, you would probably be a fan of USC or UCLA. If you grew up in West Virginia you
would be a fan of West Virginia University or Marshall. If you grew up in North Carolina, well,
you still would know better than to be a fan of Duke or North Carolina!
We aren’t as independent in our thinking as we
believe, which is the basic assumption I’m making in a new series of sermons
that begin today. The series is
called Think Again, and it will take
us through historical events that shape how we think and even what we believe,
especially in relation to our faith.
Our thinking is shaped by many factors. Tanya’s grandmother lived through the
Great Depression. I remember her
picking the mold off of bread rather than throwing it away. She would chide us for being wasteful,
and she was correct. She lived in
a time when no one could afford to be wasteful; I grew up in a generation that
had so much we didn’t think twice about throwing things away. My mom disliked the decade of the
60’s. She didn’t like the protests
and the upheaval in society. To
me, it was normal. Our historical
setting, along with many other factors, shape our thinking, even about God.
This morning we begin with a message titled
Which Kingdom?
It comes from an
event that took place 1,700 years ago today. Constantine, one of the rivals for the leadership of the
Roman Empire, was camped with his army outside the city of Rome. The night before what has become known
as The Battle of the Milvian Bridge Constantine had a vision, and in the vision
he sees the cross and the words in this
sign conquer.
Constantine was
not a Christian, but believed the vision to be a sign from Christ. He commanded that his army emblazon
their shields with the Chi Rho symbol, which are the first two letters from the
Greek word for Christ. Constantine
and his army defeat Maxentius and he eventually becomes the Roman Emperor. Because he sees his victory as provided
by God, Constantine converts to Christianity.
Upon his conversion, the course of Christianity was radically
altered. In fact, this event so changed the course of Christian history I would
venture to say that Constantine’s conversion is the most significant event in
Christian history since the conversion of Paul, and it affects how we think
today. It affects how we view our
world, how we view the role of the church, and even how we view the upcoming
election.
Constantine’s conversion certainly had some positive results. Prior to his reign, Christians were
heavily persecuted by the Romans and were put to death in some of the most
heinous ways imaginable.
Constantine not only declared Christianity to be legal, he showered the
faith with money, prestige, and power.
Churches that had been destroyed were rebuilt, personal property of the
faithful that had been confiscated was returned, and the emperor worked to
bring unity to the Christian faith.
There were, though, some negative effects. Christianity, once the victim of the sword, now wielded the
power of the sword through the emperor.
Wars were now waged in the name of God, and wars become holy endeavors,
such as the Crusades. One of the
most powerful accusations skeptics make about Christianity is the amount of
violence that has been done in the name of Christ. Before Constantine, that wasn’t possible. Constantine gave the church military
power and we struggle today with the consequences of how that power has been
used over the centuries. His
conversion also brought about an entangling of church and state that remains
with us to this day. Before
Constantine, it was counter-cultural to be a Christian. After Constantine, being a Christian
was a way to get ahead in government and business. Being a Christian became the
thing to do. Before
Constantine, becoming a Christian would end a political career; after
Constantine, being Christian was a benefit to one’s political career (and it
still it). Though Americans have
always recognized the importance of the separation of church and state, the two
are still very much tangled together in complicated ways. People of faith differ, for instance,
as to whether the government is a tool to carry out the mission and purpose of
the church, which is a question that did not face the church prior to
Constantine. People now seek to
understand the best way to bring their faith to bear on the political system,
which could never happen before Constantine.
Today’s Scripture lesson, when read in light of its time rather than
ours, gives us a much different perspective. When we read this passage we do so through the lens of a
post-Constantine world. To us, we
hear Jesus saying there is a comfortable relationship between faith and the
government. Give to God what
belongs to God, and give the government what belongs to the government. A closer reading of the passage shows
us this is not at all what Jesus was saying.
Jesus is actually presenting us with a choice – choose which kingdom
will have dominion over your life.
He does this through the question of whether or not the Jewish people
should pay the tax owed to the emperor. Those who asked Jesus the question saw it as an
opportunity to trap him – if he said they should pay the tax he would lose
credibility with his own people.
To support the tax would be seen as an act of accommodation with the
Romans, whose occupation of their country was deeply despised. If Jesus said they should not pay the
tax, he would be arrested for sedition.
Either way he answered, it appeared he was trapped.
In answering the question, Jesus first proves his brilliance in a
couple of ways. First, his answer
allows him to avoid the trap they had set, while at the same time exposing
their hypocrisy, as noted by Mark.
But Jesus’ answer also has a much deeper and important meaning: his answer is actually setting up the
greater question of where we will give our loyalty – to God or to an earthly
kingdom? As the Emperor claimed to
be God, it was a choice between which God one would serve. The truth is, both God and the emperor
demand complete allegiance. The
emperor controlled every facet of people’s lives. He owned the land – as evidence by his troops – he owned the
economy, and he owned the people.
God made the same claim – all belonged to him. It wasn’t a matter of giving part of their lives to God and
another part to the emperor; it was a matter of choosing which would receive
their ultimate allegiance; only one could be chosen, not both. As
Dorothy Day said, If we rendered unto God
all the things that belong to God, there would be nothing left for Caesar (http://ecojustice.net/Coffin/Credo-Description.htm). And, I would add, Caesar would be very
unhappy about that.
I think this leaves us to ask
what it means for us today. What
does it mean for we who live in a democracy – what are we to do with the
question of rendering unto Caesar and rendering unto God?
I have just a few points to make
about what this passage means in our day and age.
Second, we can disagree on
political issues. Did you know the
early Christians were considered to be atheists and unpatriotic? They were considered so because they
did not support the belief that the Emperor was divine and they did not worship
the Roman gods. In today’s
political arena either of those names would be a harsh charge, but some use
those names if they disagree. Jesus
lived in a day when disagreement with the government got you nailed to a
cross. We can do so freely. It’s part of who we are, and it’s a
great blessing that we can agree or disagree. We should give thanks for the privilege of being allowed to
disagree, and we should never claim that someone with a different point of view
is less spiritual or less serious about their faith. The disciples had differing points of view. One of them was a Zealot, a person who
was dedicated to the overthrow of Rome by any means necessary. Another worked for the Romans. Paul used his Roman citizenship as an
aid to his ministry at various times, but Peter would have nothing to do with
the Roman authorities.
Third, our faith may lead us to
different political positions, and both sides can have a legitimate point. I really tire of the reuse of the
question What Would Jesus Do to How Would Jesus Vote and other
slogans. Maybe the more important
question is What would Jesus have me do? (Rev.
Peter J. Gomes, The Scandalous Gospel of
Jesus: What’s So Good About the Good News, New York: HarperCollins, 2007,
69). The gospel can never be
adequately expressed by boundaries of politics and positions, and when we seek
to tie it to our own views we reduce it down to something far less than God
intended it to be. There are
people on all sides of the political aisle who are very serious about their
faith, but no one side is always entirely correct.
Fifth, we are called to be about the work of God’s kingdom. The question that comes from Constantine
is this – did the empire become more Christian or did Christianity become
more like the empire? We live in
an earthly kingdom, and the issues in that kingdom are important, but as people
of God we are about God’s kingdom, which is more righteous, more just, and more
free than any earthly kingdom.
God’s kingdom has outlasted many great empires and many great powers,
and will continue. The kingdom of God is greater
than a vote, greater than a ballot box, greater than any weapon, greater than
an army that has ruled the earth, and greater than any kingdom the earth has
witnessed. The kingdom of God will
not rise or fall based on laws that are passed, the kingdom of God will not
rise or fall based on who wins – or loses an election, and the kingdom of God
will prevail regardless of how difficult or challenging thing appear to
be. If we believe differently, we
need to think again.
2 comments:
I think words "Caesar" and "democracy" can't be in one sentence... No seriously, he was an emperor in... EMPIRE! What democracy could be there?
I don't know maybe I didn't get the point but according to this article http://www.bestessay.com/essays/julius-caesar-bio2.php this is impossible.
That is exactly my point. Most people read the passage about rendering unto God what is God's and to Caesar what is Caesar's as meaning we can easily coexist with both, but we can't. Both God and Caesar are asking for complete obedience and dedication.
There certainly was no democracy under Caesar; I'll absolutely agree with your point, and I was not meaning to imply that Caesar and democracy ever coexisted.
Post a Comment