What do
you see in this image –
The
image is from the famous Rorschach test, which is a test administered by
psychiatrists to determine certain characteristics and personality traits of a
patient. There aren’t any “answers”
to the test, but it reveals the way in which people “project” their beliefs
onto the pictures.
Beliefs
are important, because they become the lens through which we see every facet of
life. This morning, as we continue
our series of messages The Journey To
Easter, we come to a passage in John’s gospel that is what I would call a spiritual Rorschach test. It’s a passage where John tells us that
Jesus had performed many miracles but despite the miracles, there were still
some who would not believe in him.
John is careful to point out that the people who would not believe in
Jesus did not hear of the miracles by second-hand information; John says those
miracles were performed in their presence, but still they would not believe in
him. How is it that some reacted
to the miracles with belief, while others reacted with non-belief?
The
question of belief is, I think, the great question of life. No one can dodge the question of belief
in God. Everyone is confronted by
that question – to believe or not to believe, and in our modern era, it seems
as though the gulf between belief and non-belief grows ever wider.
Hear the
story as John tells it –
37 Even after Jesus had performed so many
signs in their presence, they still would not believe in him.
38 This was to fulfill the word of Isaiah
the prophet:
“Lord,
who has believed our message and to whom has the arm of the Lord been
revealed?”
39 For this reason they could not believe,
because, as Isaiah says elsewhere:
40 “He has blinded their eyes and hardened
their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor
understand with their hearts, nor turn—and I would heal them.”
41 Isaiah said this because he saw Jesus’
glory and spoke about him.
42 Yet at the same time many even among the
leaders believed in him. But because of the Pharisees they would not openly
acknowledge their faith for fear they would be put out of the synagogue;
43 for they loved human praise more than
praise from God.
44 Then Jesus cried out, “Whoever believes
in me does not believe in me only, but in the one who sent me.
45 The one who looks at me is seeing the
one who sent me.
46 I have come into the world as a light,
so that no one who believes in me should stay in darkness.
47 “If anyone hears my words but does not
keep them, I do not judge that person. For I did not come to judge the world,
but to save the world.
This morning, our topic is To Believe Or Not To Believe, That Is the
Question. As Jesus was drawing
very near to the final days of his ministry, there is this widening gulf
between him and those who would not believe in him, similar to the way in which
today there seems to be a widening gap between belief and unbelief.
In considering this passage today, I want to
ask three questions, the first of which is –
1. Why do we believe what we believe?
I’m a
fan of science fiction. Last fall
I went to see the movie Interstellar,
which looked really interesting to me.
I was disappointed in the movie, but it had me thinking for weeks after
about the universe and its unimaginable size and scope. Though I didn’t find the movie to be
very good, it did a good job in presenting the incomprehensible scale of the
universe. In thinking about the
universe, it really puts into perspective how little we know. Though we live in an age of
unbelievable technology and amazing discovery, how much do we know about the
universe and the principles by which it operates? A millionth of a percent? A billionth of a percent? A billion trillion of a millionth of a percent? Whatever we know, it is such an
incredibly small amount of all the knowledge that exists in the universe (and
that may be knowledge only of one universe. There could be other universes of which we have absolutely
no knowledge). As that is true, it
seems incredibly shortsighted, to me, to say there is enough knowledge to
disprove the existence of God, and indeed, to claim that kind of knowledge
seems to me very arrogant.
Why do
we believe what we believe? As
I’ve said before, it is inaccurate to say that seeing is believing; the truth is that believing is seeing. What
we already believe, will determine what we see. If a person holds to a scientific, materialistic,
reductionist view of things, that is, if they believe you can only believe in
what you see, then you won’t believe there is anything beyond the physical,
which would rule out the existence of God. What we believe dictates what we see, and in the view of
scientific materialism, it is a very limited view.
But
faith reorients what we believe so that we are then able to see in a different
manner. As we are in the midst of
March Madness, allow me to use a basketball analogy. How do we know when a referee makes a bad call? I mean, really, how do we know? Is it always obvious? I believe we see the call according to
what we already believe. The truth
is, when a referee makes a call he is viewed as wise and perceptive by half the
crowd and as an incompetent idiot by the other half. And the view that each fan has of the referee’s call is
based upon what they already believe, not the particular actions or ruling of
the referee. The perception of
each fan is colored by their loyalty to a team and whether or not the referee
makes a call that is either for or against their team. Just follow along on Facebook during a
game or sit with a group of fans and you’ll see what I mean. I walked through a hospital waiting
room yesterday during the UK game, just in time to hear the room erupt with
protests of he traveled! In a parallel universe, located in
Cincinnati, I imagine they were saying the complete opposite. This is how we react; we see things a particular way because of
what we believe.
I
appreciate when someone tells me they enjoyed one of my sermons or one of my Sentinel columns, but I also understand
what it often means – it means they agree with what I have to say. “Like” becomes a synonym for “agree,”
and we all want our beliefs to be reinforced. That is one of the reasons we come to church, and it is one
of the primary reasons why people leave church or change churches – because
their beliefs are not given enough affirmation. Jesus certainly did not affirm the beliefs of the religious
establishment, and that is why they decided he must be put to death.
There isn’t anything inherently wrong with wanting our beliefs
affirmed. One of the reasons we
feel uneasy with our rapidly changing world is the fear that our beliefs are
being marginalized in a modern world.
We begin to feel out-of-step with things, and that is a difficult place
to live.
But faith reorients our thinking, it moves us beyond the erroneous
beliefs we hold so we will be able to understand truth, which leads to our next
question –
2. What Is Truth?
What is truth?
Pilate asked Jesus. That is an
incredibly important question. Who
determines what is true?
Science claims to tell us what is true about our world and the universe,
but can they really get down to what constitutes truth? I don’t think so. Science can tell us some of the facts
about the way in which our universe operates, at least in our tiny little
corner of the universe. Who knows;
physics may operate differently in another part of the universe, or in another
universe all together. Just
because something is true in our part of creation doesn’t guarantee it is true
in all of creation.
Can science tell us the purpose of creation, and of life? No, because science only deals with
those things we can observe, that we can see and touch and measure. Science can’t get to that purpose, or
discover it, or measure it. That is
the domain of faith. According to
some scientists, the universe is the result of random events, and if that is
true, there is no inherent purpose or meaning. Though one might believe there is a purpose and meaning in a
random universe, there is not.
We are more than flesh and blood creatures; we are the handiwork of
God and possess a soul. You can’t
take a soul and measure it in a test tube in a laboratory. Faith reminds us there is something
greater than what can be learned in a science experiment.
Faith also reminds us that truth is anchored in something that is
eternal and unchanging. If the
universe is random, there are no truths, beyond some basic scientific
facts. The only truths in a random
universe are things such as the speed of light, which may not be constant
everywhere in the unvierse; the amount of time in a day, which can vary as
light is dispersed at greater distances in the universe; so even the constants
of physics and science are not unalterable truths. But faith links us to the eternal – to God – so the truths
of love, compassion, and grace are not true just when a society says they are;
they are always true.
Faith makes the claim that we are anchored in eternal, unchanging
truths, one of which is love. Love
is not the result of a random act of nature, love is a creation of God, which
leads us to our third question –
3. How Can We Know God?
The primary question is, does God exist? In terms of this question, our beliefs don’t matter. That is, God exists whether or not I
believe in him. Reality is
reality; God exists or not independently of our beliefs, although our beliefs
are important because they have consequences.
In terms of evidence, there are several strong evidences, I believe,
for the existence of God, but ultimately I think there is one great proof, and
it is love. If the universe is
random, if there is nothing behind it but happenstance, then love is nothing
more than the firing of neurons in our brain and the release of chemicals that
make us feel good. In that
scenario, love is noting more than a trick of the brain, or a neurological
activity. But does anyone really
believe that is all that constitutes love? No, no even the strongest unbeliever.
Love is something more than just activity in our brains, love is
more than the firing of neurological activity, and more than the release of
brain chemicals; love is the proof that there is something transcendent in life
and about life; it points to something greater and deeper. It points, I believe, to God.
But how do we know the details about God? We are people of revelation, that is, we believe God reveals
truth to us. One of the ways God
reveals truth to us is through Scripture, but if you are speaking with a
skeptic they will most likely reject any argument that is based from
Scripture. Is there, then, a more
effective proof? Yes. Allow me to offer another metaphor,
this time in the form of this novel that I’m holding. Imagine you are one of the characters in
this book. How would you know
anything about the author? How
would you know anything about the world beyond the one that exists in this book? Could you even conceive that an author
exists or have the capacity to comprehend an author or a world outside of the
book? You might think where did I come from? I must have come from somewhere, so
someone put me here. Even
recognizing that, however, the two realms – one within the book and one without
– remain very distant and distinct from one another. But imagine if the author puts himself into the book, into
the story. Literally, into the
story. That is exactly what God
did. In theological terms, we call
it the Incarnation. In everyday
language, we call it Jesus.
The gulf between belief and unbelief may seem to be quite large, and
in one sense, perhaps it is. On
the surface, at least, people believe or they don’t. But we are all God’s children, and God loves each of his
children – believers or not – and if he does, then so must we. If God entered into this world, into
the story of his own creation, to demonstrate his live, then so must we enter
the story of the lives of others.